Why Good Engineers Struggle as Project Leaders

Read time - 3 minutes

Good engineers are promoted because they deliver.
They solve problems.
They bring certainty to complex situations.

Then they’re asked to lead a project.

And suddenly, what made them successful starts working against them.

Not because they’re doing anything wrong—but because the role has changed.

Table of Contents

Engineering and Project Leadership Optimise for Different Things

Engineering rewards:

  • Accuracy

  • Control

  • Technical correctness

If something isn’t right, you analyse it.
If something breaks, you fix it yourself.

Project leadership rewards something else entirely:

  • Timely decisions

  • Clear ownership

  • Value delivered through others

Projects don’t move forward because one person has the best answer.
They move forward because uncertainty is managed and momentum is protected.

Where the Struggle Shows Up

Strong engineers stepping into project leadership often:

  • Stay too close to technical detail

  • Delay decisions to reduce rework

  • Carry risk personally to “protect” the outcome

These behaviours feel responsible.
In practice, they slow down delivery.

The shift isn’t about doing less.
It’s about changing where your impact sits.

The Project Leadership Operating Mode

Use the self-check below to see how you’re currently operating.

Score each question:

  • 0 = Engineer-led

  • 1 = Mixed

  • 2 = Project-led

Question

0 – Engineer-Led

1 – Mixed

2 – Project-Led

How are problems handled?

I personally solve them

I solve critical ones

Ownership is assigned and followed up on

How are decisions made?

Decisions wait for clarity

Some decisions move, others stall

Decisions are made early to maintain flow

How is success measured?

Technical correctness

Quality plus delivery

Value and outcomes achieved

How is risk managed?

I carry most of it

Shared informally

Explicit owners and actions are in place

Total score: ____ / 8

What Your Score Means — and What to Do Next

  • 0–3 → Engineer-Led Mode
    You’re optimising for correctness.
    Do this next: Assign ownership for one decision or risk instead of solving it yourself.

  • 4–5 → Transitional Mode
    You switch styles depending on pressure.
    Do this next: Set clear decision deadlines instead of scheduling more discussion.

  • 6–8 → Project-Led Mode
    You’re optimising for flow and outcomes.
    Double down: Protect decision speed and keep ownership visible.

This isn’t about becoming less technical.
It’s about using your technical judgement to enable progress, not replace it.

Strong engineers don’t struggle as project leaders because they lack capability.
They struggle because no one tells them what to stop optimising for.

When the focus shifts from having the right answer to keeping the project moving, leadership starts to feel lighter—and results follow.

P.S. If this issue resonated and we’re not connected yet, connect with me on LinkedIn.

You can also:
– Read past issues at The Saturday Mindset.
Subscribe here to receive one clear, practical idea every Saturday.

See you next Saturday!