Predictive, Agile, and Hybrid: Finding the Right Fit

When it comes to managing projects, there’s no one-size-fits-all approach. The way you plan and deliver work depends on the type of project and the environment you’re in. Let’s break down the three main approaches.

Table of Contents

• Predictive (Waterfall)

• Agile

• Hybrid

• How We Apply It in Practice

• Quick Comparison at a Glance

• Takeaway

Predictive (Waterfall)

This approach is all about planning everything up front. You define the scope, set the budget, lock in the schedule, and then execute step by step. It’s structured, reliable, and works best when the path ahead is clear.

Agile

Agile flips the script. Instead of one big plan, you deliver in smaller chunks, constantly checking in with stakeholders and adjusting along the way. It’s a great fit for fast-changing environments where flexibility is more valuable than sticking to a rigid plan.

Hybrid

Hybrid sits right in the middle. You get the certainty of predictive planning where it matters most, while keeping room to adapt in areas where change is expected.

How We Apply It in Practice

At my current company, we mainly use the predictive approach. It makes sense — most of our projects involve large capital investments, compliance requirements, and safety considerations. In this context, having a detailed plan from the start gives us the control we need to deliver on time and on budget.

Quick Comparison at a Glance

Takeaway

Each approach has its place. The real skill is knowing which one to use — or combine — depending on the project’s nature.

P.S. Every week, I share practical steps on project management/productivity you can apply at work or in life.
See more at vandersonbaril.com.

See you next Saturday!